SPEEDY TRIAL VIOLATION RESULTS IN CASE DISMISSAL ON APPEAL.
While client was in custody, he filed multiple motions under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition on Detainers Act. The attorney who represented him on the motion in the district court misunderstood the effect of client's motions. Although client correctly argued for his release, the district court, the prosecutor, and apparently his attorney failed to properly apply the law. Entering argument on appeal, Attorney Adam Stolte effectively advocated for client's position, changing the mind of the appellate court, resulting in client's release.